Permissible Medical Experiments
The great weight of the evidence before us to effect that certain types of medical experiments on human beings, when kept within reasonably well-defined bounds, conform to the ethics of the medical profession generally. The protagonists of the practice of human experimentation justify their views on the basis that such experiments yield results for the good of society that are unprocurable by other methods or means of study. All agree, however, that certain basic principles must be observed in order to satisfy moral, ethical and legal concepts:
- The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, overreaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision. This latter element requires that before the acceptance of an affirmative decision by the experimental subject there should be made known to him the nature, duration, and purpose of the experiment; the method and means by which it is to be conducted; all inconveniences and hazards reasonably to be expected; and the effects upon his health or person which may possibly come from his participation in the experiment.
The duty and responsibility for ascertaining the quality of the consent rests upon each individual who initiates, directs, or engages in the experiment. It is a personal duty and responsibility which may not be delegated to another with impunity.
- The experiment should be such as to yield fruitful results for the good of society, unprocurable by other methods or means of study, and not random and unnecessary in nature.
- The experiment should be so designed and based on the results of animal experimentation and a knowledge of the natural history of the disease or other problem under study that the anticipated results justify the performance of the experiment.
- The experiment should be so conducted as to avoid all unnecessary physical and mental suffering and injury.
- No experiment should be conducted where there is an a priori reason to believe that death or disabling injury will occur; except, perhaps, in those experiments where the experimental physicians also serve as subjects.
- The degree of risk to be taken should never exceed that determined by the humanitarian importance of the problem to be solved by the experiment.
- Proper preparations should be made and adequate facilities provided to protect the experimental subject against even remote possibilities of injury, disability or death.
- The experiment should be conducted only by scientifically qualified persons. The highest degree of skill and care should be required through all stages of the experiment of those who conduct or engage in the experiment.
- During the course of the experiment the human subject should be at liberty to bring the experiment to an end if he has reached the physical or mental state where continuation of the experiment seems to him to be impossible.
- During the course of the experiment the scientist in charge must be prepared to terminate the experiment at any stage, if he has probable cause to believe, in the exercise of the good faith, superior skill and careful judgment required of him, that a continuation of the experiment is likely to result in injury, disability, or death to the experimental subject.
OK, it might be an extreme example. However Germany is following Austria in Lock-Step in imposing vaccine mandates. Germany Announces National Lockdown for Unvaccinated. Jeepers, I did not see that coming.
Let me make one thing clear, I am not an “anti-vaxxer.” It should be a choice, and the data is out there that for some high-risk groups, it is a good thing. BUT (there is always a couple of buts) But! The shot (it cannot really be called a vaccine-more in a bit)
Way back in 1905, there was a case “Jacobson v. Massachusetts, 197 U.S. 11” That granted the State Police power over the individual for the greater good “Justice John Marshall Harlan delivered the decision for a 7–2 majority that the Massachusetts law did not violate the Fourteenth Amendment. The Court held that “in every well ordered society charged with the duty of conserving the safety of its members the rights of the individual in respect of his liberty may at times, under the pressure of great dangers, be subjected to such restraint, to be enforced by reasonable regulations, as the safety of the general public may demand” and that “[r]eal liberty for all could not exist under the operation of a principle which recognizes the right of each individual person to use his own [liberty], whether in respect of his person or his property, regardless of the injury that may be done to others.“
Sound familiar? (Oh, this decision as also used was case precedent for Buck v. Bell, 274 U.S. 200 (1927) (sterilization of those with intellectual disabilities-how about that!)
Well, that is all fine and well when we are talking about an actual vaccine. What we have here my friends is an experimental therapy that has a higher percentage of causing harm. 75 European Fully Vaccinated Athletes Have Died or Became Seriously Ill From “Sudden” Heart Attacks In the Past 5 Months. Well, they are catching on as to why, but I do not see it in the news. “A frightening new potential explanation for vaccine-driven myocarditis and other problems” In short, the Frankenstein they created causes the “stimulated immune response” to attack the body and organs.
Two 15-year-olds, illegally vaccinated before the EUA, are dead. EVERYONE should pay attention. This was before the “Emergency Use Authorisation”.
So what is the shot? It sure as heck is NO vaccine. What is a vaccine?
” a suspension of attenuated or killed microorganisms (viruses, bacteria, or rickettsiae), administered for prevention, amelioration, or treatment of infectious diseases.”
What they are mandating for folk (and now even Children) to have put into their bodies with or without consent is NOT a vaccine.. The CDC Suddenly Changes the Definition of ‘Vaccine’ and ‘Vaccination’ “…They appear to be changing the definition to fit what we’re being told about the COVID-19 vaccines — that they don’t necessarily provide immunity but just “protection” from more serious illness. Meanwhile, it fits with the push for more “booster” shots, to keep up the continued “protection.” So they’ve changed the definition of vaccines so that it no longer means preventing the disease or producing immunity. Whereas before it wouldn’t necessarily meet their definition of a vaccine, now it meets the new definition….” (Nick Arama)
Even the courts seem to be catching on. In another article the Judge was quoted that his decision was based on the apparent fact that folks that get the shot, still are able to transmit the disease. (Remember 1905? I guess he did.) 6th Circuit Court Rules Against Biden Administration in OSHA Vaccine Mandate Lawsuit
Well it would appear that this genetically modified “solution,” the mRNA shot is anything but vaccine. The price of Moderna (MRNA!) stock two years ago was $18.60 it is now over $306. How did this happen? Here is the story: COVID-19: Moderna Gets Its Miracle… Pfizer/ BioNTech has also posted very tasty profits as well…and now come the boosters. Strangely, the FDA Wants Until 2076 To Fully Release Pfizer Vaccine Data. HUH???? Some information has come out, and it does not look like they were playing fair, “For every one child saved by the shot, another 117 would be killed by the shot“
Unfortunately, it is a bit inconvenient that the British have been keeping very accurate records that show Covid vaccines will keep you from acquiring full immunity EVEN IF YOU ARE INFECTED AND RECOVER. Oh, wait there is more. “We are mandating a vaccine where there is no scientific evidence that it has ever saved a single life?“
So why all of this stress and Hoopla to get the shot? Well grasshopper, let me tell you it is all about fear, control and profits. My wife got the shot, not because she was required to, just that the constant barrage of news, images on the media of the piles of bodies in Italy and the reports that were waiting to be cremated. A woman named Cornelia Betsch a professor of health communication at the University of Erfurt (Very ironic since the firm J.A. Topf und Söhne hail from there as well) She is, to be polite, a professional in propaganda and has been instructing the government on how to manipulate the public: Nudge Tyranny, An Erfurt Professor of Health Communications advises the German government on how best to manipulate the populace.
This is all very strange, since from the beginning Dr George Fareed and Dr Brian Tyson developed an Early Treatment Protocol Here is a bit of it, and it is worth a read.
HCQ = hydroxychloroquine
IVM = Ivermectin
ZN = Zinc Sulfate
DOXY = Doxycycline
AZM = Azithromycin
ASA = Aspirin
D3 = Vitamin D3
C19 mAbs = Eli Lilly or Regeneron dual Covid-19 monoclonal antibodies
HCQ 200 mg tabs #16 (HCQ = hydroxychloroquine)
Zinc sulfate 220 mg (or elemental Zinc 50 mg) # 15
Azithromycin 500 mg # 5 (or Z pack) or Doxycycline 100 mg # 10
Ivermectin 3 mg tabs #8
Aspirin 325 mg tabs #30Vitamin D3 5000IU #30
Why do we not hear about this, simple. Profits, fear and control. Proof? How about this for a control population: 240 Million! The Undeniable Ivermectin Miracle in India’s 240m Populated Largest State, Uttar Pradesh
So in closing, I hope I provided enough information. It would appear that we are reliving the history of 70 years ago of control and fear; one mask, two injections, and boosters without end. At least there are no box cars to climb into yet. OH, wait, there is Australia, I am sure that they are SO happy to have turned in their guns. COVID Concentration Camps For Australians; It’s Happening